Skip to main content

SK Law House Legal Articles

Law updates, legal guidance, and practical articles for clients and readers of `sklawhouse.com`.

Latest Legal Articles - Chennai

Madras High Court order in G. Gopalakrishnan vs Gnanaselvi CRP No. 6933 of 2026 dated 05.11.2026 directing Tambaram Rent Court to dispose of RLTOP within 6 weeks, SK Law House Vandavasi

Speedy Eviction Under Tamil Nadu New Tenancy Act: Madras High Court Directs Rent Court to Dispose of RLTOP Within Six Weeks

2026-11-09 10:12:16

In G. Gopalakrishnan v. Gnanaselvi & Another (CRP No. 6933 of 2026, decided on 05.11.2026), Justice N. Anand Venkatesh of the Madras High Court exercised superintendence jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution and directed the District Munsif Court, Tambaram (Rent Court) to dispose of RLTOP No. 32 of 2024 within a strict period of six weeks.

Read full article
Madras High Court order in Google LLC vs Daulat Jain REV.APLO No. 13 of 2026 dated 03.11.2026 dismissing review petition and enforcing 15-day defamatory URL removal, SK Law House Vandavasi

Defamatory Search Results: Madras High Court Dismisses Google LLC Review Plea, Upholds 15-Day Obligation to Remove Defamatory URLs Upon Representation

2026-11-09 10:08:48

In Google LLC v. Daulat Jain & Others (REV.APLO No. 13 of 2026 in C.S. No. 456 of 2019, decided on 03.11.2026), Justice P. Dhanabal of the Madras High Court dismissed a review application filed by Google LLC, holding that search engine intermediaries are duty-bound to remove defamatory URLs linking businessmen to the 2G spectrum scam within 15 days of receiving specific URL identification from plaintiffs.

Read full article
Madras High Court order in M. Mounica vs S. Umamaheswaran CRP No. 6961 of 2026 dated 05.11.2026 directing VII Additional Family Court Chennai to dispose of HMOP within 4 months, SK Law House Vandavasi

Speedy Trial in Matrimonial Disputes: Madras High Court Directs VII Additional Family Court Chennai to Dispose of HMOP Within Four Months

2026-11-09 08:28:00

In M. Mounica v. S. Umamaheswaran (CRP No. 6961 of 2026, decided on 05.11.2026), Justice N. Anand Venkatesh of the Madras High Court exercised constitutional superintendence under Article 227 and directed the VII Additional Family Court, Chennai, to conclude the cross-examination of P.W.1 and dispose of HMOP No. 4606 of 2024 within a strict deadline of four months.

Read full article
Madras High Court — Crl.O.P.No.28543 of 2026 — Compliance Period Correction

Madras High Court POCSO Quashing Order: Compliance Period Extended to 16 Weeks

2026-11-08 17:27:39

The Madras High Court extended a compliance period from 12 to 16 weeks in a conditional POCSO quashing order. This case note explains the limited correction, the original conditions and wording that requires clarification.

Read full article
Madras High Court order in Achievers Agri India vs State Crl.O.P. No. 20223 of 2026 dated 24.09.2026 and 02.11.2026 quashing TNPID Special Court case after full settlement of 75 depositors, SK Law House Vandavasi

TNPID Special Court Proceedings Quashed After 100% Settlement of All 75 Depositors: Madras High Court Terminates Decade-Old EOW Prosecution

2026-11-08 16:19:24

In M/s. Achievers Agri India (P) Ltd. & Others v. State Rep. by DSP, EOW-II, Salem (Crl.O.P. No. 20223 of 2026, decided on 24.09.2026 and clarified on 02.11.2026), Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan of the Madras High Court quashed the entire criminal proceedings in C.C. No. 11 of 2015 on the file of the TNPID Special Court, Coimbatore, after recording that all 75 depositors involving claims of Rs. 41,23,420/- had been settled in full.

Read full article
Madras High Court order in Shek Naseer Useen vs State Crl.O.P. No. 31964 of 2026 dated 03.11.2026 quashing NDPS commercial quantity prosecution based solely on co-accused confession, SK Law House Vandavasi

NDPS Commercial Quantity Prosecution Quashed: Madras High Court Holds Co-Accused Confession Without Bank or Corroborative Proof Cannot Sustain Trial

2026-11-08 16:04:28

In Shek Naseer Useen @ Shaik Nazeer Hussian v. State (Crl.O.P. No. 31964 of 2026, decided on 03.11.2026), Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan of the Madras High Court quashed NDPS Special Court proceedings in C.C. No. 531 of 2024 involving 117.850 Kgs of ganja against Accused No. 5 and ordered his immediate release from Puzhal Central Prison, holding that a co-accused's police confession is inadmissible under Section 23 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (Section 25 Evidence Act) and Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu.

Read full article
section-138-ni-act-appeal-20-percent-deposit-upheld-time-extended-crl-op-19171-2026-madras-high-court.webp

Section 138 NI Act Appeal and 20% Compensation Deposit: Madras High Court Upholds Appellate Condition Absent Exceptional Circumstances and Extends Time to Deposit

2026-11-08 15:49:41

In Mohanlal Bora v. M/s. Darshan Comtrade Pvt. Ltd. (Crl.O.P. No. 19171 of 2026, decided on 03.11.2026), Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan of the Madras High Court applied the Supreme Court precedent in Jamboo Bhandari and held that while the 20% compensation deposit for suspension of sentence in a cheque bounce appeal can be reduced or exempted in exceptional cases, the appellate order must be upheld where no valid exceptional circumstance is shown, while granting an extension of time to comply.

Read full article
Madras High Court order in Selvamurugan vs State Crl.O.P. No. 16985 of 2026 dated 04.11.2026 deleting Rs. 20 lakh property document bail condition, SK Law House Vandavasi

Onerous Bail Condition Requiring Rs. 20 Lakh Property Document Deleted: Madras High Court Modifies Sessions Court Anticipatory Bail Order in Chit Dispute

2026-11-08 15:37:02

In Selvamurugan v. State (Crl.O.P. No. 16985 of 2026, decided on 04.11.2026), Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan of the Madras High Court deleted an onerous anticipatory bail condition imposed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Puducherry, which had required the accused to produce a property title document worth Rs. 20,00,000/- in a case arising out of a disputed chit fund transaction.

Read full article
Madras High Court ruling in Abhishek vs The State Crl.O.P. No. 9519 of 2026 dated 02.11.2026 holding written grounds of arrest mandatory under Article 22(1) and BNSS, SK Law House Vandavasi

Written Grounds of Arrest Mandatory Under Article 22(1) and Section 47(1) BNSS: Madras High Court Sets Aside NDPS Remand Order

2026-11-08 15:19:00

In Abhishek v. The State (Crl.O.P. No. 9519 of 2026, decided on 02.11.2026), Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan of the Madras High Court set aside a judicial remand order in an NDPS case, holding that generic "reasons for arrest" in a template arrest memo cannot substitute for communicating specific "grounds of arrest" in writing under Article 22(1) of the Constitution and Section 47(1) of the BNSS.

Read full article
Conceptual legal cover showing anti-corruption case files, gavel, and scales of justice with headline DVAC Probe & Anti-Corruption Law

Anti-Corruption Mandamus and Review Limits: Madras High Court Clears Decks for DVAC Probe in Municipal Recruitment Case

2026-11-08 08:38:21

The Madras High Court First Division Bench has dismissed a review application filed by a former minister, holding that review jurisdiction under Article 226 cannot be used to stifle a lawful investigation when prima facie materials disclose cognizable corruption offenses.

Read full article
Apartment covered parking bay with purchase agreements and payment receipts illustrating a consumer dispute over parking charges.

Builder Parking Charges: Tamil Nadu Consumer Commission Rejects Unproved Extra-Payment Claim

2026-11-07 13:17:31

A July 2026 Tamil Nadu consumer appeal highlights why proof of a separate parking charge matters and why a complaint’s exact prayer must match its evidence.

Read full article
Auction Sale Certificate Registration and Police Objections — SK Law House illustration

Auction Sale Certificate and Police Objection: Madras High Court Permits Re-presentation

2026-11-06 22:04:24

The High Court permitted re-presentation of a sale certificate with objections and documents and directed a reasoned order if registration was refused.

Read full article
Trademark, Copyright and Passing Off in One Suit — SK Law House illustration

Trademark, Copyright and Passing Off in One Suit: Madras High Court Allows Joinder

2026-11-06 21:58:52

The Madras High Court permitted Apex Laboratories to combine trademark infringement, copyright infringement and passing off claims in one commercial suit.

Read full article
CHOCLAIRS Trademark: Composite Marks and Non-Use — SK Law House illustration

Cadbury–Lotte CHOCLAIRS Dispute: Madras High Court Frames Trademark Trial Issues

2026-11-06 21:58:48

The Madras High Court framed issues on trademark ownership, rights in a composite mark, non-use and passing off in the CHOCLAIRS dispute.

Read full article
Trademark Renewal After Delayed Registration — SK Law House illustration

Trademark Renewal After Delayed Registration: Madras High Court Explains Rule 58(3)

2026-11-06 21:58:45

The Madras High Court directed the Registry to accept a renewal request where registration came after the renewal date and the mark still remained on the register.

Read full article
ELITE Trademark and Honest Concurrent Use — SK Law House illustration

ELITE Class 11 Trademark: Madras High Court Sets Aside Refusal

2026-11-06 21:58:42

The Madras High Court directed advertisement of the ELITE device application after examining the evidence of use and the Registrar’s treatment of Section 12.

Read full article
Class 34 Trademark Refusal and Journal Advertisement — SK Law House illustration

Madras High Court Orders Journal Advertisement After Refusal of Class 34 Label

2026-11-06 21:58:39

The Madras High Court set aside the refusal of a Class 34 label after comparing how the Registry had treated the same cited marks in an earlier application.

Read full article
Cheque Bounce Sentence Suspension in Criminal Revision — SK Law House illustration

Madras High Court Suspends Cheque Bounce Sentence Pending Criminal Revision

2026-11-06 21:52:14

The High Court granted conditional bail and suspended a Section 138 NI Act sentence while the criminal revision remained pending.

Read full article
Supreme Court ruling in J. Rajesh v. M. Kumaran 2026 INSC 1208 holding son has no right by birth in father's partitioned property under Section 8 HSA, SK Law House Vandavasi

Son Has No Right by Birth in Father's Partitioned Share: Supreme Court Dismisses Minor's Partition Suit Under Section 8 Hindu Succession Act

2026-11-06 19:59:32

In J. Rajesh (Minor) v. M. Kumaran (Dead) & Others (2026 INSC 1208, decided on 06.11.2026), the Supreme Court affirmed that when property devolves upon Class I heirs under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 and is partitioned, a son takes his divided share as absolute individual property and his son (grandson) acquires no right by birth during his father's lifetime.

Read full article
Madras High Court order in Google LLC vs Daulat Jain REV.APLO No. 13 of 2026 dated 03.11.2026 dismissing review petition and enforcing 15-day defamatory URL removal, SK Law House Vandavasi

Defamatory Search Results: Madras High Court Dismisses Google LLC Review Plea, Upholds 15-Day Obligation to Remove Defamatory URLs Upon Representation

2026-11-03 20:08:34

In Google LLC v. Daulat Jain & Others (REV.APLO No. 13 of 2026 in C.S. No. 456 of 2019, decided on 03.11.2026), Justice P. Dhanabal of the Madras High Court dismissed a review application filed by Google LLC, holding that search engine intermediaries are duty-bound to remove defamatory URLs linking businessmen to the 2G spectrum scam within 15 days of receiving specific URL identification from plaintiffs.

Read full article
Land agreement, forgery allegation and appointment of an arbitrator by Madras High Court

Forgery Allegation Cannot Automatically Prevent Arbitration: Madras High Court Judgment 2026

2026-10-30 19:00:00

Madras High Court appoints a sole arbitrator in a land aggregator agreement dispute despite a forgery allegation, examining the existence of the arbitration clause.

Read full article
Sangeetha versus Sangethas restaurant trademark dispute and Madras High Court interim injunction

Sangeetha vs Sangethas: Madras High Court Grants Interim Trademark Injunction | 2026

2026-10-30 17:30:14

Madras High Court grants interim relief in Sangeetha vs Sangethas restaurant trademark dispute, examining deceptive similarity and the likelihood of consumer confusion.

Read full article
Madras High Court on Article 227 and interim maintenance under Section 24 Hindu Marriage Act in C Hariharan v M Sowmya

Interim Maintenance Under Section 24 HMA: Madras High Court Explains Limits of Article 227

2026-10-30 16:42:58

Madras High Court refused to interfere with interim maintenance of Rs 20,000 for wife and Rs 7,000 for child, explaining limited Article 227 supervision.

Read full article
Madras High Court judgment concerning wife's income, interim maintenance and child support

Wife Earning ₹95,000: Madras High Court Revises Interim Maintenance and Protects Child Support

2026-10-29 17:00:00

In Raguram v Bhuvana, Madras High Court considers the wife's admitted ₹95,000 monthly income and directs ₹10,000 child maintenance plus school fees.

Read full article
OCI registration cancellation judgment concerning missionary activity and Citizenship Act permissions

OCI Registration Cancellation for Missionary Activity Without Permission Upheld by Madras High Court

2026-10-26 19:05:23

Madras High Court upholds cancellation of an OCI registration in John Daniel v Union of India over missionary activities conducted without required permission.

Read full article
Conceptual legal cover showing Supreme Court of India building facade, judicial scales, and formal case files with headline Article 142 & Criminal Quash

Anti-Defection Law and MLA Resignations: Can Resignation Nullify Tenth Schedule Disqualification? Madras High Court Sets Strict Two-Month Mandate for Assembly Speaker

2026-10-13 20:00:00

In a landmark constitutional ruling, the Madras High Court First Division Bench has held that an MLA's resignation does not wipe out pending Tenth Schedule disqualification proceedings, directing the Tamil Nadu Assembly Speaker to decide disqualification petitions within two months to uphold constitutional trust.

Read full article
Stay updated instantly

Turn on notifications for legal updates, new articles, and important office alerts.

Get email updates too

Receive legal articles, important notices, and office updates in your inbox.

Office enquiry

Send a brief enquiry for office follow-up. Please keep confidential documents for a private discussion.

WhatsApp