Skip to main content

SK Law House Legal Articles

Law updates, legal guidance, and practical articles for clients and readers of `sklawhouse.com`.

Articles tagged Constitutional Law

Browse all articles

Madras High Court ruling in Abhishek vs The State Crl.O.P. No. 9519 of 2026 dated 02.11.2026 holding written grounds of arrest mandatory under Article 22(1) and BNSS, SK Law House Vandavasi

Written Grounds of Arrest Mandatory Under Article 22(1) and Section 47(1) BNSS: Madras High Court Sets Aside NDPS Remand Order

2026-11-08 15:19:00

In Abhishek v. The State (Crl.O.P. No. 9519 of 2026, decided on 02.11.2026), Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan of the Madras High Court set aside a judicial remand order in an NDPS case, holding that generic "reasons for arrest" in a template arrest memo cannot substitute for communicating specific "grounds of arrest" in writing under Article 22(1) of the Constitution and Section 47(1) of the BNSS.

Internal links: Vandavasi | Vandavasi | Vandavasi
Read full article
Supreme Court of India 7 Judge Bench Sales Tax Surcharge Constitutional Law Judgment Arjun Flour Mills 2026 INSC 1192 SK Law House Vandavasi

Supreme Court 7-Judge Bench Upholds State Sales Tax Surcharge: S. Kodar (1974) Affirmed, Surcharge Is Not Tax on Tax or Tax on Income (2026 INSC 1192)

2026-11-04 19:46:57

In a historic 7-Judge Constitution Bench verdict, the Supreme Court of India in Arjun Flour Mills v. State of Odisha (2026 INSC 1192) unanimously affirmed the landmark ratio of S. Kodar v. State of Kerala (1974). The Bench ruled that a State sales tax surcharge or additional sales tax calculated as a percentage of tax payable is an enhancement of the rate of tax under Entry 54 of List II, and not an unconstitutional tax on tax or tax on dealer income.

Internal links: Vandavasi | Vandavasi | Vandavasi
Read full article
Madras High Court Division Bench ruling in Periyasamy vs District Collector Salem W.P. No. 23649 of 2026 holding Nilaviyal Pathai in patta land is not government property under RSO 26(15), SK Law House Vandavasi

Nilaviyal Pathai in Patta Land Is Not Government Property: Madras High Court Quashes Eviction Notice, Holds RSO 26(15) Expropriation Ultra Vires, and Imposes Costs on Tahsildar

2026-10-15 15:46:42

In a landmark 55-page verdict in Periyasamy & Another v. The District Collector, Salem (2026:MHC:4244, W.P. No. 23649 of 2026, decided on 15.10.2026), a Division Bench of the Madras High Court quashed a Section 6 eviction notice, held that Revenue Standing Order 26(15) declaring plan-marked pathways in private patta lands as Government property without due process is ultra vires Article 300-A, granted landowners the right to realign field pathways, and slapped token costs on the Tahsildar.

Internal links: Arani | Cheyyar | Tiruvannamalai
Read full article
Stay updated instantly

Turn on notifications for legal updates, new articles, and important office alerts.

Get email updates too

Receive legal articles, important notices, and office updates in your inbox.

Office enquiry

Send a brief enquiry for office follow-up. Please keep confidential documents for a private discussion.

WhatsApp