Skip to main content

SK Law House Legal Articles

Law updates, legal guidance, and practical articles for clients and readers of `sklawhouse.com`.

Articles tagged Madras High Court

Browse all articles

Madras High Court First Bench order dismissing review plea and closing contempt petition after DVAC registered FIR.

Madras High Court Dismisses Review & Closes Contempt After DVAC Registers FIR in Cash-for-Jobs Case

2026-11-13 00:01:39

The First Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed former Minister K.N. Nehru's review application against the February 20, 2026 direction for a DVAC FIR in the cash-for-jobs case and closed the connected contempt petition after the State confirmed FIR registration.

Read full article
Madras High Court judgment in R. Karthikeyan vs Union of India (W.P. No. 30622 of 2026) protecting judicial independence.

Police Must Refuse Permission for Protests Personally Targeting Sitting Judges: Madras High Court (W.P. No. 30622 of 2026)

2026-11-13 00:01:39

In R. Karthikeyan v. Union of India & Ors. (W.P. No. 30622 of 2026), the First Bench of the Madras High Court directed Tamil Nadu Police not to permit assemblies that personally target or intimidate sitting judges and ordered Cyber Crime monitoring of online intimidation.

Read full article
Madras High Court judgment in A. Chidambaram vs State (2026:MHC:4155) on Magistrate jurisdiction under Section 175(3) BNSS.

Magistrate Cannot Conduct Premature Mini-Trial on Civil Title While Deciding Section 175(3) BNSS Plea: Madras High Court (2026:MHC:4155)

2026-11-13 00:01:39

In A. Chidambaram v. State (Crl.R.C. No. 919 of 2026, 2026:MHC:4155), the Madras High Court set aside a Judicial Magistrate's dismissal of a Section 175(3) BNSS complaint, holding that a pending civil dispute does not bar criminal investigation into forgery and fabrication.

Read full article
Madras High Court Madurai Bench judgment on standard of proof for adultery under the Hindu Marriage Act.

Mere Presence of Another Person in Matrimonial Home Cannot Prove Adultery Without Reliable Evidence: Madras High Court

2026-11-13 00:01:39

In M.S. v. V.K., the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court held that the mere presence of a third person in the matrimonial home, absent reliable proof of an adulterous relationship, cannot sustain divorce under Section 13(1)(i) of the Hindu Marriage Act.

Read full article
Madras High Court Madurai Bench judgment in R. Anandha Ramakrishnan vs Assistant Director ED (2026:MHC:4462) on Section 223(1) BNSS.

BNSS Section 223(1) Proviso Gives PMLA Accused Statutory Right to Relied-Upon Documents Pre-Cognizance: Madras HC (2026:MHC:4462)

2026-11-13 00:01:39

In R. Anandha Ramakrishnan v. The Assistant Director, ED (2026:MHC:4462), the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court held that under the first proviso to Section 223(1) of BNSS, an accused in a PMLA complaint has a statutory right to receive relied-upon documents at the pre-cognizance stage.

Read full article
Madras High Court Madurai Bench order in A. Shahul Hameed vs State of Tamil Nadu directing Special Courts for Prevention of Corruption Act trials.

Madras High Court Flags 2,423 Pending Corruption Cases, Directs State to Establish Dedicated Special Courts Under PC Act

2026-11-13 00:01:39

In A. Shahul Hameed v. State of Tamil Nadu (Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 11066 of 2026), the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court held that 2,423 pending graft cases cannot be treated as routine additional work for Principal District Judges, directing dedicated Special Courts and prosecutors.

Read full article
Madras High Court order in G. Gopalakrishnan vs Gnanaselvi CRP No. 6933 of 2026 dated 05.11.2026 directing Tambaram Rent Court to dispose of RLTOP within 6 weeks, SK Law House Vandavasi

Speedy Eviction Under Tamil Nadu New Tenancy Act: Madras High Court Directs Rent Court to Dispose of RLTOP Within Six Weeks

2026-11-09 10:12:16

In G. Gopalakrishnan v. Gnanaselvi & Another (CRP No. 6933 of 2026, decided on 05.11.2026), Justice N. Anand Venkatesh of the Madras High Court exercised superintendence jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution and directed the District Munsif Court, Tambaram (Rent Court) to dispose of RLTOP No. 32 of 2024 within a strict period of six weeks.

Read full article
Madras High Court order in Google LLC vs Daulat Jain REV.APLO No. 13 of 2026 dated 03.11.2026 dismissing review petition and enforcing 15-day defamatory URL removal, SK Law House Vandavasi

Defamatory Search Results: Madras High Court Dismisses Google LLC Review Plea, Upholds 15-Day Obligation to Remove Defamatory URLs Upon Representation

2026-11-09 10:08:48

In Google LLC v. Daulat Jain & Others (REV.APLO No. 13 of 2026 in C.S. No. 456 of 2019, decided on 03.11.2026), Justice P. Dhanabal of the Madras High Court dismissed a review application filed by Google LLC, holding that search engine intermediaries are duty-bound to remove defamatory URLs linking businessmen to the 2G spectrum scam within 15 days of receiving specific URL identification from plaintiffs.

Read full article
Madras High Court order in Fathima vs N. Mujifur Rahuman CRP No. 1066 of 2024 dated 04.11.2026 rejecting triple talaq divorce plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC as barred by law, SK Law House Vandavasi

Suit for Dissolution of Marriage Based on Triple Talaq Barred by Law: Madras High Court Rejects Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC

2026-11-09 08:59:00

In Fathima v. N. Mujifur Rahuman (CRP No. 1066 of 2024, decided on 04.11.2026), Justice N. Anand Venkatesh of the Madras High Court set aside the order of the Additional Family Court, Coimbatore, and rejected a husband's civil plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, ruling that a suit seeking dissolution of marriage founded on triple talaq notices is void, illegal, and barred by law under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019.

Read full article
Madras High Court order in M. Mounica vs S. Umamaheswaran CRP No. 6961 of 2026 dated 05.11.2026 directing VII Additional Family Court Chennai to dispose of HMOP within 4 months, SK Law House Vandavasi

Speedy Trial in Matrimonial Disputes: Madras High Court Directs VII Additional Family Court Chennai to Dispose of HMOP Within Four Months

2026-11-09 08:28:00

In M. Mounica v. S. Umamaheswaran (CRP No. 6961 of 2026, decided on 05.11.2026), Justice N. Anand Venkatesh of the Madras High Court exercised constitutional superintendence under Article 227 and directed the VII Additional Family Court, Chennai, to conclude the cross-examination of P.W.1 and dispose of HMOP No. 4606 of 2024 within a strict deadline of four months.

Read full article
Madras High Court — Crl.O.P.No.28543 of 2026 — Compliance Period Correction

Madras High Court POCSO Quashing Order: Compliance Period Extended to 16 Weeks

2026-11-08 17:27:39

The Madras High Court extended a compliance period from 12 to 16 weeks in a conditional POCSO quashing order. This case note explains the limited correction, the original conditions and wording that requires clarification.

Read full article
Madras High Court order in Achievers Agri India vs State Crl.O.P. No. 20223 of 2026 dated 24.09.2026 and 02.11.2026 quashing TNPID Special Court case after full settlement of 75 depositors, SK Law House Vandavasi

TNPID Special Court Proceedings Quashed After 100% Settlement of All 75 Depositors: Madras High Court Terminates Decade-Old EOW Prosecution

2026-11-08 16:19:24

In M/s. Achievers Agri India (P) Ltd. & Others v. State Rep. by DSP, EOW-II, Salem (Crl.O.P. No. 20223 of 2026, decided on 24.09.2026 and clarified on 02.11.2026), Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan of the Madras High Court quashed the entire criminal proceedings in C.C. No. 11 of 2015 on the file of the TNPID Special Court, Coimbatore, after recording that all 75 depositors involving claims of Rs. 41,23,420/- had been settled in full.

Read full article
Madras High Court order in Shek Naseer Useen vs State Crl.O.P. No. 31964 of 2026 dated 03.11.2026 quashing NDPS commercial quantity prosecution based solely on co-accused confession, SK Law House Vandavasi

NDPS Commercial Quantity Prosecution Quashed: Madras High Court Holds Co-Accused Confession Without Bank or Corroborative Proof Cannot Sustain Trial

2026-11-08 16:04:28

In Shek Naseer Useen @ Shaik Nazeer Hussian v. State (Crl.O.P. No. 31964 of 2026, decided on 03.11.2026), Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan of the Madras High Court quashed NDPS Special Court proceedings in C.C. No. 531 of 2024 involving 117.850 Kgs of ganja against Accused No. 5 and ordered his immediate release from Puzhal Central Prison, holding that a co-accused's police confession is inadmissible under Section 23 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (Section 25 Evidence Act) and Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu.

Read full article
Madras High Court order in Selvamurugan vs State Crl.O.P. No. 16985 of 2026 dated 04.11.2026 deleting Rs. 20 lakh property document bail condition, SK Law House Vandavasi

Onerous Bail Condition Requiring Rs. 20 Lakh Property Document Deleted: Madras High Court Modifies Sessions Court Anticipatory Bail Order in Chit Dispute

2026-11-08 15:37:02

In Selvamurugan v. State (Crl.O.P. No. 16985 of 2026, decided on 04.11.2026), Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan of the Madras High Court deleted an onerous anticipatory bail condition imposed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Puducherry, which had required the accused to produce a property title document worth Rs. 20,00,000/- in a case arising out of a disputed chit fund transaction.

Read full article
Madras High Court ruling in Abhishek vs The State Crl.O.P. No. 9519 of 2026 dated 02.11.2026 holding written grounds of arrest mandatory under Article 22(1) and BNSS, SK Law House Vandavasi

Written Grounds of Arrest Mandatory Under Article 22(1) and Section 47(1) BNSS: Madras High Court Sets Aside NDPS Remand Order

2026-11-08 15:19:00

In Abhishek v. The State (Crl.O.P. No. 9519 of 2026, decided on 02.11.2026), Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan of the Madras High Court set aside a judicial remand order in an NDPS case, holding that generic "reasons for arrest" in a template arrest memo cannot substitute for communicating specific "grounds of arrest" in writing under Article 22(1) of the Constitution and Section 47(1) of the BNSS.

Read full article
Illustration of a compassionate appointment application and a school in Arani

Arani Compassionate Appointment Claim Dismissed After Long Delay

2026-11-07 08:30:00

The Madras High Court dismissed an Arani compassionate appointment claim after considering the withdrawal letter and the passage of nearly three decades.

Internal links: Arani | Tiruvannamalai | Arani
Read full article
Tiruvannamalai Plaint Return and SARFAESI Section 34 — SK Law House illustration

Tiruvannamalai Partition Plaint Returned on SARFAESI Objection: High Court Directs Hearing if Needed

2026-11-07 08:30:00

The Madras High Court allowed re-presentation of a Tiruvannamalai partition plaint and directed an open-court hearing if the explanation did not satisfy the trial court.

Read full article
Tiruvannamalai Gratuity Dispute Interim Stay — SK Law House illustration

Tiruvannamalai Gratuity Dispute: Madras High Court Grants Four-Week Interim Stay

2026-11-07 08:30:00

The Madras High Court granted a four-week interim stay in a Tiruvannamalai employer’s gratuity dispute after noting an earlier deposit.

Read full article
Arunachaleswarar Temple Oversight and Deepam Facilities — SK Law House illustration

Arunachaleswarar Temple Oversight: Madras High Court Appoints Monitoring Committee

2026-11-07 08:30:00

The Madras High Court dismissed two appeals, directed steps for pilgrim amenities and set up a committee to monitor compliance.

Read full article
Title Deed Deposit and Planning Approval in Tamil Nadu — SK Law House illustration

Title Deed Deposit Refused as Unapproved: Madurai Bench Checks the Planning Approval

2026-11-06 22:04:49

The Madurai Bench set aside a refusal check slip after the record showed that the local planning authority had approved the property or building.

Read full article
Refusal Check Slip and Section 72 Registration Appeal — SK Law House illustration

Refusal Check Slip, Reasoned Order and Section 72 Appeal: Madras High Court Explains the Steps

2026-11-06 22:04:28

The Division Bench set aside a direction to register a power of attorney and allowed the presenter to pursue the statutory appeal.

Read full article
Auction Sale Certificate Registration and Police Objections — SK Law House illustration

Auction Sale Certificate and Police Objection: Madras High Court Permits Re-presentation

2026-11-06 22:04:24

The High Court permitted re-presentation of a sale certificate with objections and documents and directed a reasoned order if registration was refused.

Read full article
Settlement Deed Based on an Unregistered Will — SK Law House illustration

Settlement Deed Based on an Unregistered Will: Madras High Court Upholds Limited Enquiry

2026-11-06 22:04:20

The Division Bench upheld a limited enquiry after the Sub Registrar issued a refusal slip for a settlement deed relying on an unregistered will.

Read full article
Fresh Online Filing for a New Sale Deed in Tamil Nadu — SK Law House illustration

New Sale Deed With a Different Claimant Requires Fresh Online Filing: Madurai Bench

2026-11-06 22:04:15

The Madurai Bench upheld the refusal in this case because the deed was fresh and the claimant differed from the earlier presentation.

Read full article
Trademark, Copyright and Passing Off in One Suit — SK Law House illustration

Trademark, Copyright and Passing Off in One Suit: Madras High Court Allows Joinder

2026-11-06 21:58:52

The Madras High Court permitted Apex Laboratories to combine trademark infringement, copyright infringement and passing off claims in one commercial suit.

Read full article
CHOCLAIRS Trademark: Composite Marks and Non-Use — SK Law House illustration

Cadbury–Lotte CHOCLAIRS Dispute: Madras High Court Frames Trademark Trial Issues

2026-11-06 21:58:48

The Madras High Court framed issues on trademark ownership, rights in a composite mark, non-use and passing off in the CHOCLAIRS dispute.

Read full article
Trademark Renewal After Delayed Registration — SK Law House illustration

Trademark Renewal After Delayed Registration: Madras High Court Explains Rule 58(3)

2026-11-06 21:58:45

The Madras High Court directed the Registry to accept a renewal request where registration came after the renewal date and the mark still remained on the register.

Read full article
ELITE Trademark and Honest Concurrent Use — SK Law House illustration

ELITE Class 11 Trademark: Madras High Court Sets Aside Refusal

2026-11-06 21:58:42

The Madras High Court directed advertisement of the ELITE device application after examining the evidence of use and the Registrar’s treatment of Section 12.

Read full article
Class 34 Trademark Refusal and Journal Advertisement — SK Law House illustration

Madras High Court Orders Journal Advertisement After Refusal of Class 34 Label

2026-11-06 21:58:39

The Madras High Court set aside the refusal of a Class 34 label after comparing how the Registry had treated the same cited marks in an earlier application.

Read full article
Anonymised Madras High Court order on Article 21 reproductive autonomy and medical termination under the MTP Act, 4 November 2026

Minor Survivor’s Medical Termination of Pregnancy: Madras High Court Applies Article 21 and MTP Act

2026-11-04 17:44:25

Madras High Court permitted medically supervised termination of a minor survivor’s pregnancy after considering the Medical Board, her wishes, Article 21 and Section 5 MTP Act.

Read full article
Madras High Court order in Dilli vs Jothi CRP No. 4690 of 2026 dated 03.11.2026 holding unregistered release deed admissible for collateral purpose in partition suit upon impounding, SK Law House Vandavasi

Unregistered and Insufficiently Stamped Release Deed Admissible for Collateral Purpose in Partition Suit Upon Impounding: Madras High Court

2026-11-03 21:47:23

In Dilli & Others v. Jothi (CRP No. 4690 of 2026, decided on 03.11.2026), Justice N. Anand Venkatesh of the Madras High Court modified an order of the Sub Court, Chengalpattu, holding that while an unstamped document is generally barred under Section 35 of the Stamp Act, the Trial Court in a partition suit can impound an unregistered release deed, collect stamp duty with penalty, and admit it for collateral purpose.

Read full article
Madras High Court order in Google LLC vs Daulat Jain REV.APLO No. 13 of 2026 dated 03.11.2026 dismissing review petition and enforcing 15-day defamatory URL removal, SK Law House Vandavasi

Defamatory Search Results: Madras High Court Dismisses Google LLC Review Plea, Upholds 15-Day Obligation to Remove Defamatory URLs Upon Representation

2026-11-03 20:08:34

In Google LLC v. Daulat Jain & Others (REV.APLO No. 13 of 2026 in C.S. No. 456 of 2019, decided on 03.11.2026), Justice P. Dhanabal of the Madras High Court dismissed a review application filed by Google LLC, holding that search engine intermediaries are duty-bound to remove defamatory URLs linking businessmen to the 2G spectrum scam within 15 days of receiving specific URL identification from plaintiffs.

Read full article
Land agreement, forgery allegation and appointment of an arbitrator by Madras High Court

Forgery Allegation Cannot Automatically Prevent Arbitration: Madras High Court Judgment 2026

2026-10-30 19:00:00

Madras High Court appoints a sole arbitrator in a land aggregator agreement dispute despite a forgery allegation, examining the existence of the arbitration clause.

Read full article
Sangeetha versus Sangethas restaurant trademark dispute and Madras High Court interim injunction

Sangeetha vs Sangethas: Madras High Court Grants Interim Trademark Injunction | 2026

2026-10-30 17:30:14

Madras High Court grants interim relief in Sangeetha vs Sangethas restaurant trademark dispute, examining deceptive similarity and the likelihood of consumer confusion.

Read full article
Madras High Court on Article 227 and interim maintenance under Section 24 Hindu Marriage Act in C Hariharan v M Sowmya

Interim Maintenance Under Section 24 HMA: Madras High Court Explains Limits of Article 227

2026-10-30 16:42:58

Madras High Court refused to interfere with interim maintenance of Rs 20,000 for wife and Rs 7,000 for child, explaining limited Article 227 supervision.

Read full article
Madras High Court judgment concerning wife's income, interim maintenance and child support

Wife Earning ₹95,000: Madras High Court Revises Interim Maintenance and Protects Child Support

2026-10-29 17:00:00

In Raguram v Bhuvana, Madras High Court considers the wife's admitted ₹95,000 monthly income and directs ₹10,000 child maintenance plus school fees.

Read full article
OCI registration cancellation judgment concerning missionary activity and Citizenship Act permissions

OCI Registration Cancellation for Missionary Activity Without Permission Upheld by Madras High Court

2026-10-26 19:05:23

Madras High Court upholds cancellation of an OCI registration in John Daniel v Union of India over missionary activities conducted without required permission.

Read full article
Madras High Court Division Bench ruling in Periyasamy vs District Collector Salem W.P. No. 23649 of 2026 holding Nilaviyal Pathai in patta land is not government property under RSO 26(15), SK Law House Vandavasi

Nilaviyal Pathai in Patta Land Is Not Government Property: Madras High Court Quashes Eviction Notice, Holds RSO 26(15) Expropriation Ultra Vires, and Imposes Costs on Tahsildar

2026-10-15 15:46:42

In a landmark 55-page verdict in Periyasamy & Another v. The District Collector, Salem (2026:MHC:4244, W.P. No. 23649 of 2026, decided on 15.10.2026), a Division Bench of the Madras High Court quashed a Section 6 eviction notice, held that Revenue Standing Order 26(15) declaring plan-marked pathways in private patta lands as Government property without due process is ultra vires Article 300-A, granted landowners the right to realign field pathways, and slapped token costs on the Tahsildar.

Internal links: Tiruvannamalai | Vandavasi | Vandavasi
Read full article
Madras High Court order in K. Kumar vs The Tahsildar Vandavasi W.P. No. 8412 of 2026 directing patta transfer disposal within 12 weeks, SK Law House Vandavasi

Patta Transfer Delay in Vandavasi Taluk: Madras High Court Mandates Tahsildar to Dispose of Application Within Twelve Weeks

2026-04-02 20:59:56

In K. Kumar v. The Tahsildar, Vandavasi Taluk (W.P. No. 8412 of 2026), the Madras High Court issued a Writ of Mandamus directing the Tahsildar, Vandavasi Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District, to consider the petitioner's statutory application for patta transfer on merits and pass final speaking orders within a strict deadline of 12 weeks after conducting a due inquiry.

Internal links: Tiruvannamalai | Vandavasi | Vandavasi
Read full article
Stay updated instantly

Turn on notifications for legal updates, new articles, and important office alerts.

Get email updates too

Receive legal articles, important notices, and office updates in your inbox.

Office enquiry

Send a brief enquiry for office follow-up. Please keep confidential documents for a private discussion.

WhatsApp